Collaborate Collegially on Legal Writing

Have you ever circulated for review and comment what you thought was a well-written draft motion or brief? Then you know how disconcerting it feels when your draft is returned with so much redlining (or undecipherable handwritten edits and notes), that your original is barely visible. How should you, a previously confident legal writer with […]

Collaborate Collegially on Legal Writing Read More »

Supreme Court’s Sports Betting Decision Reveals Hidden Preemption Requirement

On May 14, the Supreme Court held in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association that the federal Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (“PASPA”) is unconstitutional. The Court ruled that PASPA’s  prohibition against States authorizing sports betting violates the “anticommandeering principle,” which precludes Congress from directing States to take, or refrain from taking, particular legislative

Supreme Court’s Sports Betting Decision Reveals Hidden Preemption Requirement Read More »

Supreme Court Declines To Review D.C. Circuit Drone Strike Case That Implicates Separation of Powers

In Ali Jaber v. United States, No. 16-5093 (D.C. Cir. June 30, 2017), recently retired D.C. Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown authored a unanimous panel opinion faithfully applying circuit precedent and the political question doctrine to bar a declaratory judgment suit challenging the wisdom of a U.S. drone strike in Yemen that allegedly resulted in

Supreme Court Declines To Review D.C. Circuit Drone Strike Case That Implicates Separation of Powers Read More »

Federal Court Won’t Second-Guess U.S. Military Combat-Zone Decisions

After almost eight years of consolidated, multidistrict, pretrial proceedings—including massive jurisdictional discovery and a succession of dispositive motions and appeals—Judge Roger W. Titus of the U.S. District Court of the District of Maryland on July 19, 2017 dismissed in its entirety the “Burn Pit” toxic-tort multidistrict litigation.  The primary defendant, Kellogg Brown & Root Services,

Federal Court Won’t Second-Guess U.S. Military Combat-Zone Decisions Read More »

Learning the High Art of Amicus Brief Writing

There is an art to writing amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs. Capital Appellate Advocacy’s Larry Ebner, who serves DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar as Chair of its Amicus Committee, has written an article in the February 2017 edition of For The Defense, “Learning the High Art of Amicus Brief Writing.”  The article — which has been

Learning the High Art of Amicus Brief Writing Read More »

It’s Time To Fix FIFRA Preemption

Under FIFRA, the federal pesticide law, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state agencies both have authority to regulate the sale and use of agricultural, industrial, structural, and consumer pesticides, but only EPA can regulate the content and format of nationally uniform pesticide product labeling. Emboldened by a 1991 Supreme Court decision, and despite state-imposed preemption

It’s Time To Fix FIFRA Preemption Read More »

Is It Finally Time To Fix FIFRA Preemption?

FIFRA is the comprehensive federal statute that for the past 70 years has regulated “pesticides”—a term which encompasses a broad range of agricultural, professional, industrial, and consumer pest control products.   One of the most persistent as well as hotly contested areas of pesticide regulation involves the subject of “preemption”—the supremacy of federal law over

Is It Finally Time To Fix FIFRA Preemption? Read More »

Tough Times for Forum Shoppers

The Supreme Court’s June 19 decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court reaffirms well-established principles for state court exercise of specific (case-linked) personal jurisdiction.  As a practical matter, the opinion  curtails forum shopping for plaintiff-friendly courts in connection with tort actions brought by multi-state groups of plaintiffs against companies that are not “at home” in a forum state.

Tough Times for Forum Shoppers Read More »

Update: DRI’s Supreme Court Amicus Program

DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar files amicus briefs at both the certiorari and merits stages in cases raising legal issues that are exceptionally important to the civil defense bar and its clients.  I have the privilege of serving as Chair of the DRI Amicus Committee, which reviews requests for DRI amicus support.  The attached

Update: DRI’s Supreme Court Amicus Program Read More »

Scroll to Top