If a federal contractor can establish that it is entitled to “derivative sovereign immunity” when hit with personal injury litigation for carrying out the government’s work, is it immune from suit or merely protected from liability? And if a federal district court denies a motion to dismiss that is based on derivative sovereign immunity, is […]
This week I filed on behalf of DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar, through its Center for Law and Public Policy, an amicus curiae brief urging the Supreme Court to review a question that is fundamental to civil litigation fairness: When a private party sues a federal contractor for alleged tortious conduct in connection with
I am honored to be joining the DRI Center for Law & Public Policy’s leadership team — Kathy Guilfoyle (Chair), Gardner Duvall and I (Co-Vice Chairs), Steve Puiszis (Immediate Past Chair), Toyja Kelley (DRI Immediate Past President & Officer Liaison), Jill Cranston Rice (Issues & Advocacy Committee Chair), Joseph Hanna (External Policy Allilance Committee Chair),
Larry Ebner Joins DRI Center for Law and Public Policy Leadership Team Read More »
Under the leadership and with the guidance of Executive Director John Kouris, DRI continues to be the voice of the civil defense bar in the Supreme Court of the United States. Congratulations to Matt Nelson and Zach Chaffee-McClure on becoming Chair and Vice of DRI’s Amicus Committee, which reviews the steady stream of requests that
DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar in the U.S. Supreme Court Read More »
Early in law school, one of my esteemed (but perhaps grammatically challenged) professors explained that the key to understanding any case is figuring out “who is suing who, and why?” On January 15, the Justices very well may have been asking themselves that question during the Supreme Court’s hearing in Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Jackson, No. 17-1471. In
Who is Suing Who, and Why? Read More »
Class actions are big business for the plaintiffs bar. Lawyers have a better chance of pocketing enormous, disproportionate, attorney fee awards if they can litigate, or force settlement of, consumer class actions in plaintiff-friendly state courts. Congress enacted the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) in 2005 to help curb state-court class action abuses. One of
Supreme Court Will Review Unfair Class Action Tactic Read More »
Class actions have become a lucrative business for the plaintiffs’ bar. National corporate defendants sometimes settle even frivolous claims for substantial amounts, especially in plaintiff-friendly state courts. To curb state-court class-action abuses, the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) expressly authorizes “any defendant” to remove (i.e., transfer) a qualifying class action from state court to federal court,
DRI Files Amicus Brief Urging Supreme Court To Review Class-Action Fairness Issue Read More »
Through scholarship, legal expertise, and advocacy, the Center for Law and Public Policy acts as a think tank and public voice for DRI and its 22,000 members on issues of importance to the civil litigation defense bar. As Chair of the DRI Amicus Committee, I am privileged to be part of the Center’s leadership. We met at DRI
DRI Center for Law & Public Policy Focuses on Civil Justice Read More »
On March 14 I had the privilege of moderating a lively and insightful panel on The Economics of Appellate Practice: Surviving, and Hopefully Thriving, as an Appellate Litigator at the DRI Appellate Advocacy Seminar in Las Vegas. The three panelists – Wendy Cole Lascher, Partner at Ferguson Case Orr Patterson LLP, Ventura, California; Richard M. Wolff, Vice President-Complex
DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar has filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court supporting the certiorari petition in Ferrellgas Partners, L.P. v. Morgan-Larson, LLC, No. 17-441. In its brief, DRI urges the Supreme Court to grant review and clarify the scope and application of the “continuing violation doctrine” insofar as it applies to
DRI Brief Urges Supreme Court To Enforce Antitrust Statute Of Limitations Read More »
