ALF Amicus Brief Argues That Courts, Not Bureaucrats, Should Interpret Federal Regulations

The certiorari petition in AMN Services v. Clarke, No. 21-296, presents a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) question about the relationship between per-diem payments for business-related travel and the calculation of overtime pay.  AMN Services, a healthcare temporary staffing company, reduces the amount of per-diem payments for traveling nurses who decline to work all of their […]

ALF Amicus Brief Argues That Courts, Not Bureaucrats, Should Interpret Federal Regulations Read More »

ALF Urges Supreme Court To Clarify Federal Preemption Of Pesticide Failure-To-Warn Suits

I today filed on behalf of the Atlantic Legal Foundation a petition-stage amicus brief supporting Petitioner Monsanto Company in Monsanto Co. v. Hardeman, No. 21-241. The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) vests the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with exclusive authority to regulate the content of pesticide product labeling. FIFRA accomplishes this by expressly

ALF Urges Supreme Court To Clarify Federal Preemption Of Pesticide Failure-To-Warn Suits Read More »

ALF Amicus Brief Supports Supreme Court Review of “Justice Delayed is Justice Denied” Appeal

I today filed on behalf of the Atlantic Legal Foundation and the Cato Institute a petition-stage amicus brief supporting the Petitioner in  Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, No. 21-86.  Ilya Shapiro,  Vice President & Director of the Cato Institute’s Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies, joined me on the brief as co-counsel. The

ALF Amicus Brief Supports Supreme Court Review of “Justice Delayed is Justice Denied” Appeal Read More »

Amicus Brief Urges Supreme Court To Review Junk Science “Talc” Litigation

Personal injury lawyers have been filing thousands of lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson, alleging that its cosmetic talc products, such as Johnson’s Baby Powder, contain asbestos and cause ovarian cancer in women. In one of the most highly publicized talc suits, Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson, the notoriously plaintiff-friendly City of St. Louis state circuit court

Amicus Brief Urges Supreme Court To Review Junk Science “Talc” Litigation Read More »

Amicus Brief Argues That Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied

In light of recent Supreme Court precedent, there is a substantial question about whether administrative enforcement proceedings prosecuted by independent regulatory agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission(SEC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) before their own  removal-for-cause-only administrative law judges (ALJs) violate the separation of powers, and thus are unconstitutional. Federal courts of

Amicus Brief Argues That Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied Read More »

Amicus Brief Takes Aim At Use of Real Person’s Face & Body In “Shooter” Video Game Character

Gears of War continues to be among the most popular Xbox “shooter” video game franchises. One of game’s original and recurring characters is Augustus “Cole Train” Cole, a brutal interplanetary “Delta Squad” warrior whose realistic face, voice, and physique closely resemble Lenwood Hamilton, a former professional wrestler. Hamilton filed suit in a Pennsylvania federal district

Amicus Brief Takes Aim At Use of Real Person’s Face & Body In “Shooter” Video Game Character Read More »

Amicus Brief Argues That Sound Science – Not The “Precautionary Principle” – Belongs In The Courtroom

The City of Bainbridge Island, Washington, has adopted a state-approved Shoreline Management Program (“SMP”), which requires property owners to set aside vegetation buffers and conservation easements to protect Puget Sound shoreline from the supposed ecological impacts of residential construction, landscaping, and recreational activities. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal to the state Growth Management Hearings Board,

Amicus Brief Argues That Sound Science – Not The “Precautionary Principle” – Belongs In The Courtroom Read More »

Amicus Brief Argues That Climate Change Tort Suits Belong – If Anywhere – In Federal, Not State, Courts

During the past several years, state and local governments around the United States have filed at least 19 state-court suits seeking to hold fossil fuel energy companies liable under state common law (such as public nuisance law) for allegedly contributing to climate change and its harmful effects. The defendant energy companies have been largely unsuccessful

Amicus Brief Argues That Climate Change Tort Suits Belong – If Anywhere – In Federal, Not State, Courts Read More »

Amicus Brief Urges Supreme Court To Limit Nationwide Class Actions

In Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, 137 S. Ct. 1773 (2017), the Supreme Court held that for a state court to assert “specific personal jurisdiction” over the claims of out-of-state plaintiffs in a “mass-action” suit, there must be a substantial connection between the nonresident plaintiffs’ claims and the conduct of the defendant

Amicus Brief Urges Supreme Court To Limit Nationwide Class Actions Read More »

Amicus Brief Supports Meaningful Judicial Review of SEC Constitutional Challenge

In light of recent Supreme Court decisions, there is a substantial question about whether SEC administrative enforcement proceedings, conducted by SEC Administrative Law Judges who can be removed only “for cause,” violate the separation of powers. The certiorari petition in Gibson v. SEC, No. 20-276,  asks the Supreme Court to decide whether  a constitutional challenge to

Amicus Brief Supports Meaningful Judicial Review of SEC Constitutional Challenge Read More »

Scroll to Top