On behalf of the DRI Center for Law and Public Policy, Larry Ebner, who chairs the Center, has submitted a letter to the U.S. Judicial Conference’s Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure recommending that Fed. R. App. P. 29(a) be amended to eliminate the requirement to obtain the parties’ consent, or the court’s permission, […]
I am delighted that DRI President Lana A. Olson has appointed me as Chair of the Center for Law & Public Policy-“The Voice of the Civil Defense Bar.” The Center serves DRI and its 14,000 members as that voluntary bar association’s think tank and advocacy voice. I look forward to working during the next 2 years with The Center’s
My Appointment as Chair of the DRI Center for Law & Public Policy Read More »
Last October, less than a month before the mid-term election, the Biden administration announced mass cancellation of student loan debt owed to the federal government by approximately 20 million borrowers. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that under the program—which is currently enjoined—more than $400 billion in student debt would be wiped out. Other estimates exceed
ALF Argues That Half-Trillion Dollar Student Debt Cancellation Is Unconstitutional Read More »
For the sixth straight year, I have been selected by Thomson Reuters as a Washington, D.C Super Lawyer – Appellate. Thank you for this recognition!
Selected Again As a Washington, D.C. Super Lawyer – Appellate Read More »
On behalf of the DRI Center for Law and Public Policy, I have submitted a letter to the Judicial Conference’s Standing Committee recommending that Fed. R. App. P. 29(a) be amended to eliminate the requirement to obtain the parties’ consent, or the court’s permission, for filing amicus briefs. The Center’s recommendation follows the recent elimination
When the Supreme Court announced that effective January 1, 2023, it no longer will require the parties’ consent, or the Court’s permission, to file an amicus brief, Capital Appellate Advocacy founder Larry Ebner posted a short alert about this development on LinkedIn. After that alert – which proposed that that the same requirement be eliminated
Widely Read Op-Ed Urges Eliminating Amicus Consent Requirement In Federal Appeals Courts Read More »
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) food and labeling standards define foie gras as duck or goose liver “obtained exclusively from specially fed and fattened geese and ducks.” This centuries-old process, long used in France , involves “force feeding” geese and ducks to enlarge their livers. It is the only way to produce genuine foie gras. California,
The Supreme Court on December 5 announced revisions to its rules—including elimination of the requirement that an amicus curiae obtain either the parties’ consent or the Court’s permission prior to filing its friend-of-the-court brief. “Deleting the consent requirement reflects how commonplace the filing of amicus briefs has become in the Supreme Court. The federal courts of appeals should follow
Supreme Court Ditches Amicus Consent Requirement Read More »
The Atlantic Legal Foundation has filed a Supreme Court merits-stage amicus brief, advocating for broad attorney-client privilege protection, including for in-house corporate counsel. Case Background The attorney-client privilege protects the confidentiality of communications between lawyers and their clients. In Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981), the Supreme Court held that the privilege applies in
ALF Brief Supports Broad Protection For Attorney-Client Communications Read More »
“Writing amicus curiae (‘friend of the court’) briefs is my favorite activity as an appellate lawyer,” Capital Appellate Advocacy founder and Atlantic Legal Foundation Executive Vice President & General Counsel Larry Ebner explains at the beginning of his recent article, How To Draft An Amicus Brief That Actually Gets Read. Published by the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel in
How To Draft An Amicus Brief That Actually Gets Read Read More »
