Supreme Court’s FCA Seal Violation Opinion Lacks Needed Guidance

The U.S. Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion in State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. United States ex rel. Rigsby, No. 15­513 (Dec. 6, 2016), is a disappointingly narrow decision. It merely holds that dismissal of a False Claims Act qui tam suit for violation of the “seal” provision, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(2), is not mandatory. […]

Supreme Court’s FCA Seal Violation Opinion Lacks Needed Guidance Read More »

Supreme Court Punts On Another Federal Preemption Product-Liability Conundrum

What do prescription drugs, motor boats, pesticides, automobiles, medical devices, locomotives, cigarettes, vaccines, and oil tankers have in common?  During the past 25 years, each has been the subject of at least one Supreme Court opinion concerning federal preemption of state-law product liability claims.  No uniform rule has emerged from those opinions (e.g., there is

Supreme Court Punts On Another Federal Preemption Product-Liability Conundrum Read More »

Justices Should Consider Harm To Qui Tam Defendants

The unresolved question debated at the November 1 U.S. Supreme Court hearing in State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. United States ex rel. Rigsby, No. 15-513, involves the standard for dismissing a False Claims Act qui tam suit where the relator (i.e., whistleblower plaintiff), or the relator’s attorney, willfully violates the statute’s mandatory seal

Justices Should Consider Harm To Qui Tam Defendants Read More »

Abu Ghraib Contractor Still Faces Potential Tort Liability for Alleged Detainee Abuse

The Iraq War is still being fought, but in the federal courts rather than on foreign battlefields.  On October 21, 2016, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued what is probably the most refined and nuanced opinion of any federal court on the question of whether the political question

Abu Ghraib Contractor Still Faces Potential Tort Liability for Alleged Detainee Abuse Read More »

Larry Ebner Quoted In Two Law360 Feature Articles on Supreme Court Amicus Briefs

Two recent Law360 feature articles on the influence of U.S. Supreme Court amicus briefs quote Larry Ebner, founder of Capital Appellate Advocacy PLLC, a Washington, D.C.-based appellate litigation boutique. The October 19 article, entitled “6 Ways To Be the High Court’s Best Friend,” quotes Larry on the advantages of representing amicus groups “with a strong reputation of

Larry Ebner Quoted In Two Law360 Feature Articles on Supreme Court Amicus Briefs Read More »

American Academy of Appellate Lawyers Inducts Larry Ebner As Fellow

Lawrence S. Ebner was among the appellate attorneys inducted as  Fellows of the American Academy of Appellate Lawyers (AAAL) at its Fall 2016 meeting in San Antonio, Texas. Membership in AAAL, which is limited to 500 members, is reserved for experienced appellate advocates who have demonstrated the highest skill level and integrity. Nominations to the

American Academy of Appellate Lawyers Inducts Larry Ebner As Fellow Read More »

DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar Files Supreme Court Amicus Brief on False Claims Act Qui Tam Seal-Breach Dismissal Issue

Lawrence S. Ebner filed in the U.S. Supreme Court a merits-stage amicus curiae brief on behalf of DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar in State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. United States ex rel. Rigsby, No. 15-513, urging the Court to hold that a willful violation of the False Claims Act’s mandatory seal requirement should result in dismissal

DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar Files Supreme Court Amicus Brief on False Claims Act Qui Tam Seal-Breach Dismissal Issue Read More »

Text Trumps Policy in Supreme Court False Claims Act “Implied Certification” Decision

The Supreme Court’s opinion in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar, No. 15-7 (June 16, 2016), will trigger weeks of commentary, months of debate, and years of litigation on how courts should apply the “implied false certification theory” of False Claims Act liability. But as discussed below, I believe that there

Text Trumps Policy in Supreme Court False Claims Act “Implied Certification” Decision Read More »

Labor Department “Switcheroo” Gets No Respect From Supreme Court

According to Webster’s, a “switcheroo” is “an unexpected reversal or change.”  When a federal department or agency pulls a switcheroo on the public or an industry by abruptly reversing a long-held interpretation of a key statutory phrase, there can be serious economic or other consequences for those who are affected.  In an opinion issued on

Labor Department “Switcheroo” Gets No Respect From Supreme Court Read More »

Scroll to Top