Amicus Brief Urges Supreme Court To Keep “Junk Science” Away From Juries

3M Company v. Amador The Atlantic Legal Foundation (ALF), joined by Washington Legal Foundation and DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar, has filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to hear an appeal that challenges the Eighth Circuit’s lax interpretation and application of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 (Testimony by Expert Witnesses). Rule 702 was amended more than 20 years […]

Amicus Brief Urges Supreme Court To Keep “Junk Science” Away From Juries Read More »

Amicus Brief Urges Supreme Court To Explicitly Overrule Century-Old Decision That Gave States All-Purpose Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Corporations

Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. McCall, No. 21-926 Question Presented Whether an out-of-state corporate defendant’s registration to do business in a State  should be deemed consent to that State’s general jurisdiction. Case Background Imposing limits on the ability of state and federal courts to assert jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants is fundamental to due process—what

Amicus Brief Urges Supreme Court To Explicitly Overrule Century-Old Decision That Gave States All-Purpose Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Corporations Read More »

ALF Presses Supreme Court To Review Selective Exclusion of Journalists From Government Briefings

The Atlantic Legal Foundation has submitted an amicus brief supporting the certiorari petition in John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy, Inc. v. Tony Evers, Governor of Wisconsin, No. 21-388. The question presented —the proper First Amendment test for scrutinizing government officials’ selective exclusion of journalists from press conferences and briefings—goes to the heart of the

ALF Presses Supreme Court To Review Selective Exclusion of Journalists From Government Briefings Read More »

It’s Time For The Supreme Court To Revisit FIFRA Preemption

More than two decades ago, I stood before the Justices of the California Supreme Court and succeeded in persuading them that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) expressly preempts pesticide-related failure to warn claims. See Etcheverry v. Tri-Ag Service, Inc., 22 Cal.4th 316 (Cal. 2000).  Five years later, in Bates v. Dow AgroSciences,

It’s Time For The Supreme Court To Revisit FIFRA Preemption Read More »

all things amicus

ALF Urges Supreme Court To Clarify Federal Preemption Of Pesticide Failure-To-Warn Suits

I today filed on behalf of the Atlantic Legal Foundation a petition-stage amicus brief supporting Petitioner Monsanto Company in Monsanto Co. v. Hardeman, No. 21-241. The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) vests the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with exclusive authority to regulate the content of pesticide product labeling. FIFRA accomplishes this by expressly

ALF Urges Supreme Court To Clarify Federal Preemption Of Pesticide Failure-To-Warn Suits Read More »

ALF Amicus Brief Supports Supreme Court Review of “Justice Delayed is Justice Denied” Appeal

I today filed on behalf of the Atlantic Legal Foundation and the Cato Institute a petition-stage amicus brief supporting the Petitioner in  Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, No. 21-86.  Ilya Shapiro,  Vice President & Director of the Cato Institute’s Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies, joined me on the brief as co-counsel. The

ALF Amicus Brief Supports Supreme Court Review of “Justice Delayed is Justice Denied” Appeal Read More »

Supreme Court Petition Seeks Review of Important Trademark Law Issues

On August 9, 2021 I filed on behalf of Belmora LLC a Petition For a Writ of Certiorari requesting the Supreme Court to finally resolve long-standing circuit splits of authority concerning two fundamental issues of U.S. trademark law: Belmora LLC is a small, Virginia-based pharmaceutical company. It serves Hispanic-Americans by offering Belmora Pain Reliever Tablets

Supreme Court Petition Seeks Review of Important Trademark Law Issues Read More »

Panel: Strategic Use of Amicus Briefs In Appellate Litigation

On May 27, I moderated and participated in a lively panel discussion on Strategic Use of Amicus Briefs In Appellate Advocacy.  Steve Lehotsky of  Lehotsky Keller LLP and Richik Sarkar of Dinsmore & Shohl LLP joined me in the discussion, which was part of the DRI Appellate Advocacy Committee’s annual seminar. Amicus curiae briefs have

Panel: Strategic Use of Amicus Briefs In Appellate Litigation Read More »

Ebner Quoted on Significance of Supreme Court Opinion in Climate-Change Litigation

On May 17, the Supreme Court issued a 7 to 1 opinion holding that federal courts of appeals can and should review all grounds for “removing” (i.e., transferring) climate-change litigation from state court to federal court.  The Atlantic Legal Foundation filed an amicus brief in the case, BP p.l.c. v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, arguing that climate change-related damages suits

Ebner Quoted on Significance of Supreme Court Opinion in Climate-Change Litigation Read More »

Scroll to Top