Companies that do business in the United States continue to be justifiably concerned about the exploding number of onerous federal regulations that have been issued by Obama Administration departments and agencies. The Supreme Court’s March 9, 2015 decision in Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association, No. 13-1041, unavoidably bolstered the Executive Branch’s seemingly free rein by […]
Supreme Court 411 On Federal Agency 180 Read More »
Anyone interested in constitutional law or the subject of federal preemption of state law should read the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc., No. 14-15. The Court held, in an opinion authored by Justice Scalia, that the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, Art. VI, cl.2, “creates a rule of decision” — courts “must not
Supreme Opinion on the Supremacy Clause Read More »
Lawrence S. Ebner filed in the U.S. Supreme Court a certiorari-stage amicus brief on behalf of DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar in Dow Chemial Co. v. Industrial Polymers, Inc., No. 14-1091, urging the Court to curb the use of statistical modeling to establish predominance or commonality for class-certification purposes. Read the amicus brief here.
When is a “question presented” actually presented to the Supreme Court? The Justices debated that issue in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 135 S. Ct. 547 (2014). Click here to read more.
Untangling “A Little Snag” At the Supreme Court Read More »
Most of the commentary on the Supreme Court’s June 9, 2014 decision in CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, No. 13-339, has focused on the holding that CERCLA does not preempt state statutes of repose which, after a set number of years, extinguish environmental and toxic tort claims—even if the plaintiff-friendly state statute of limitations that § 9658 of CERCLA mandates has not
Supreme Court Still Divided Over How To Interpret Express Preemption Provisions Read More »
Lawrence S. Ebner filed in U.S. Supreme Court a merits-stage amicus brief on behalf of DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar in CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, No. 13-339, on the question of whether a federal preemption provision that expressly refers to state statutes of limitations governing third-party environmental damages suits also applies to state statutes of
Lawrence S. Ebner filed in the U.S. Supreme Court a certiorari-stage amicus brief on behalf of DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar in Carpenter Co. v. Ace Foam, Inc., No. 14-577, arguing that the Court has certiorari jurisdiction to review district court class-certification decisions even when a court of appeals has denied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) interlocutory
You’ve won your case in a federal court of appeals. Now the only hurdle between you and that long-awaited victory celebration is the certiorari petition that your opponent is sure to file. This article discusses whether, when, and how to oppose a certiorari petition in the U.S. Supreme Court.
When Enough is Enough! How To Oppose a Cert Petition Read More »
The United States can be a party’s best friend—or worst foe—when it enters an appeal as amicus curiae. My article for the DRI Appellate Advocacy Committee’s Certworthy newsletter provides attorneys with some practical guidance about interacting with the U.S. Department of Justice when it is engaged in the process of deciding whether to participate in an
The United States as Amicus Curiae: Making Uncle Sam Your New Best Friend Read More »
An article written by Daniel Fisher at Forbes.com quotes Larry Ebner about the significance of Food and Drug Administration approval of label warnings that are alleged to be inadequate in failure-to-warn suits. “The Supreme Court seems to make it more confusing every time it issues one of these decisions,” Ebner said.
Ebner Quoted On FDA Drug Preemption Read More »
