Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Quotes Larry Ebner in Feature Article on Supreme Court Anti-Forum Shopping Decisions

A feature article entitled “Supreme Court clamps down on state-court forum shopping,” published on July 13 in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, turns to Capital Appellate Advocacy founder Larry Ebner for comment.  In two cases decided this Spring, BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell (see Supreme Court Derails Forum Shoppers) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California (see Tough […]

Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Quotes Larry Ebner in Feature Article on Supreme Court Anti-Forum Shopping Decisions Read More »

Tough Times for Forum Shoppers

The Supreme Court’s June 19 decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court reaffirms well-established principles for state court exercise of specific (case-linked) personal jurisdiction.  As a practical matter, the opinion  curtails forum shopping for plaintiff-friendly courts in connection with tort actions brought by multi-state groups of plaintiffs against companies that are not “at home” in a forum state.

Tough Times for Forum Shoppers Read More »

Justice Gorsuch’s Exciting First Opinion

The Daily Caller’s June 12 headline declares that “Justice Gorsuch’s First SCOTUS Opinion Is Super Boring.”  Not so!  Justice Gorsuch is off to a rousing start by transforming what sounds like a super-boring topic—the meaning of “debt collector” under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act—into an opinion that from the first phrase of the first sentence

Justice Gorsuch’s Exciting First Opinion Read More »

In-House Bar Urges Supreme Court To Apply State Ethical Standards To Federal Prosecutors

Capital Appellate Advocacy founder Lawrence S. Ebner has filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the Association of Corporate Counsel urging the Supreme Court to overturn a Tenth Circuit ruling holding that a New Mexico professional conduct rule does not apply to federal prosecutors who subpoena lawyers to provide grand jury testimony about current and former clients.  The

In-House Bar Urges Supreme Court To Apply State Ethical Standards To Federal Prosecutors Read More »

Supreme Court Derails Forum Shoppers

The Supreme Court’s May 30 opinion in BNSF Railway Co. v. Tyrrell reaffirms that a State’s court system cannot exercise “general” or “all-purpose” personal jurisdiction over a corporation unless the company is incorporated in that State, has its principal place of business in that State, or otherwise is “at home” in that State.  See Daimler

Supreme Court Derails Forum Shoppers Read More »

Update: DRI’s Supreme Court Amicus Program

DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar files amicus briefs at both the certiorari and merits stages in cases raising legal issues that are exceptionally important to the civil defense bar and its clients.  I have the privilege of serving as Chair of the DRI Amicus Committee, which reviews requests for DRI amicus support.  The attached

Update: DRI’s Supreme Court Amicus Program Read More »

Supreme Court Won’t Review Discriminatory Law-Practice Statute

On April 17 the Supreme Court — in its final Order prior to Justice Neil Gorsuch’s inaugural session — declined to review the constitutionality of New York Judiciary Law § 470.  Under that law, as recently interpreted by the New York Court of Appeals, a New York bar member residing anywhere other than in New York

Supreme Court Won’t Review Discriminatory Law-Practice Statute Read More »

DRI Amicus Brief Repudiates California’s Open Invitation To Forum Shoppers

DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar has filed an amicus curiae brief in the U.S. Supreme Court to support a brand-name drug manufacturer’s challenge to a California Supreme Court ruling holding that nationwide marketing and distribution activities create enough of a “substantial connection” with California to enable that State’s courts to adjudicate out-of-state plaintiffs’ product liability claims.  The DRI brief, filed

DRI Amicus Brief Repudiates California’s Open Invitation To Forum Shoppers Read More »

Scroll to Top