Justice Kavanaugh’s Debut Supreme Court Opinion

Reprinted from The Voice (April 3, 2019), published by DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s first Supreme Court opinion is a model of stylistic clarity and judicial restraint. Writing for a unanimous Court, his January 8, 2019 opinion in Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc., No. 17-1272, holds that where […]

Justice Kavanaugh’s Debut Supreme Court Opinion Read More »

Kavanaugh Opinion Protects Internal Corporate Communications

Last Spring, shortly before being nominated to the Supreme Court, D.C. Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh issued an opinion that protects the confidentiality of internal communications between company employees and in-house attorneys.  His opinion in Federal Trade Commission v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 892 F.3d 1264 (2018), holds that the attorney-client privilege applies to an internal corporate

Kavanaugh Opinion Protects Internal Corporate Communications Read More »

Thinking Amicus

Effective use of amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs is an important part of appellate practice in federal and state courts.  Every lawyer who is handling or managing an appeal should “think amicus.”  In other words, think about whether submission of one or more amicus briefs would be helpful to your client’s position. Thinking

Thinking Amicus Read More »

Collaborate Collegially on Legal Writing

Have you ever circulated for review and comment what you thought was a well-written draft motion or brief? Then you know how disconcerting it feels when your draft is returned with so much redlining (or undecipherable handwritten edits and notes), that your original is barely visible. How should you, a previously confident legal writer with

Collaborate Collegially on Legal Writing Read More »

Supreme Court’s Sports Betting Decision Reveals Hidden Preemption Requirement

On May 14, the Supreme Court held in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association that the federal Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (“PASPA”) is unconstitutional. The Court ruled that PASPA’s  prohibition against States authorizing sports betting violates the “anticommandeering principle,” which precludes Congress from directing States to take, or refrain from taking, particular legislative

Supreme Court’s Sports Betting Decision Reveals Hidden Preemption Requirement Read More »

Supreme Court Declines To Review D.C. Circuit Drone Strike Case That Implicates Separation of Powers

In Ali Jaber v. United States, No. 16-5093 (D.C. Cir. June 30, 2017), recently retired D.C. Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown authored a unanimous panel opinion faithfully applying circuit precedent and the political question doctrine to bar a declaratory judgment suit challenging the wisdom of a U.S. drone strike in Yemen that allegedly resulted in

Supreme Court Declines To Review D.C. Circuit Drone Strike Case That Implicates Separation of Powers Read More »

Webinar: Strategic Use of Amicus Briefs in Appellate Advocacy

On October 12, 2017, Capital Appellate Advocacy founder Larry Ebner participated in a Strafford live webinar, “Strategic Use of Amicus Briefs in Appellate Advocacy.” Larry and two additional highly experienced appellate specialists, Averil Rothrock and Mary-Christine (M.C.) Sungaila, covered many amicus brief-related topics, such as the following: Click here to download the webinar Power Points.

Webinar: Strategic Use of Amicus Briefs in Appellate Advocacy Read More »

Federal Court Won’t Second-Guess U.S. Military Combat-Zone Decisions

After almost eight years of consolidated, multidistrict, pretrial proceedings—including massive jurisdictional discovery and a succession of dispositive motions and appeals—Judge Roger W. Titus of the U.S. District Court of the District of Maryland on July 19, 2017 dismissed in its entirety the “Burn Pit” toxic-tort multidistrict litigation.  The primary defendant, Kellogg Brown & Root Services,

Federal Court Won’t Second-Guess U.S. Military Combat-Zone Decisions Read More »

Scroll to Top