Third Circuit Roundup® Ruling Is Roadmap For Preemption Of Failure-To-Warn Claims

AT LAST! A federal court of appeals has correctly interpreted and applied the “parallel requirements” exception to federal preemption of pesticide-related failure-to-warn claims. Read my Law360 Expert Analysis of the Third Circuit’s August 15, 2024 decision in Schaffner v. Monsanto.

Third Circuit Roundup® Ruling Is Roadmap For Preemption Of Failure-To-Warn Claims Read More »

U.S. Judicial Conference’s Proposed Amicus Brief Amendments Are Unfriendly To The Civil Defense Bar

FDCC’s “Friday 5” newsletter for August 30 includes my article discussing why the U.S. Judicial Conference’s Proposed Amicus Brief Amendments Are Unfriendly To The Civil Defense Bar. The article explains that the pending proposal to amend Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29 would require all non-governmental amicus briefs submitted to federal courts of appeals to

U.S. Judicial Conference’s Proposed Amicus Brief Amendments Are Unfriendly To The Civil Defense Bar Read More »

amicus brief commentary

Requiring Leave To File Amicus Briefs Is A Bad Idea

The U.S. Judicial Conference’s Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules is considering a proposal to amend Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29(a) by requiring that a motion for leave be filed with all non-governmental amicus briefs in federal courts of appeals. In other words, if the proposed amendment were adopted, obtaining the parties’ consent to the

Requiring Leave To File Amicus Briefs Is A Bad Idea Read More »

Three BIG Amicus Brief Mistakes

By Lawrence Ebner, Founder, Capital Appellate Advocacy PLLC Published in Friday Fives, Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel Filing amicus curiae briefs is a well-accepted part of practicing before the Supreme Court, federal courts of appeals, and many state appellate courts. If you really want to be a “friend of the court” — if you

Three BIG Amicus Brief Mistakes Read More »

Amicus Brief-Based Analysis of Big Law Firms’ Ideological Leanings Proves Little

As a Big Law alumnus who writes and reads a lot of amicus briefs, I’m neither impressed nor surprised by a newly published statistical analysis, Ideological Leanings in Likely Pro Bono BigLaw Amicus Briefs in the United States Supreme Court, Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y Per Curiam (Winter 2024). The analysis, conducted by Prof. Derek

Amicus Brief-Based Analysis of Big Law Firms’ Ideological Leanings Proves Little Read More »

It’s Time For Attorneys & Courts To Use the Amended Expert Witness Rule

The Atlantic Legal Foundation long has been the nation’s leading advocate for use of sound science in judicial and regulatory proceedings. ALF’s advocacy in the famous Daubert trilogy of Supreme Court cases significantly contributed to the adoption of the reliability standard incorporated into Federal Rule of Evidence 702, which governs admissibility of testimony by expert witnesses. And ALF’s insistence

It’s Time For Attorneys & Courts To Use the Amended Expert Witness Rule Read More »

Moving Forward With DRI’s Center for Law and Public Policy

It’s a privilege to be chairing DRI’s Center for Law and Public Policy at a time when so many challenges are confronting the civil litigation defense bar. The July/August 2003 edition of DRI’s For The Defense magazine includes a special section on The Center’s activities. Please read my introductory comments.

Moving Forward With DRI’s Center for Law and Public Policy Read More »

Friendly Persuasion: Drafting & Using High-Impact Amicus Briefs

Power Points Updated June 2023 In June 2018 I was delighted to have recorded for DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar an on-demand webinar entitled Friendly Persuasion: Drafting & Using High-Impact Amicus Briefs. The webinar is intended for (i) trade associations, professional organizations, advocacy groups, and individual corporations that are interested in providing – or that get

Friendly Persuasion: Drafting & Using High-Impact Amicus Briefs Read More »

Is A Federal District Judge’s Amicus Invitation To Junior Attorneys A Good Idea?

“What could be better than a federal judge’s open invitation that not only offers a junior attorney the incentive to be the principal author of a brie, but also the rare opportunity to present oral argument on behalf of an amicus curiae?” On March 21, 2023, Judge Lee P. Rudofsky of the U.S. District Court

Is A Federal District Judge’s Amicus Invitation To Junior Attorneys A Good Idea? Read More »

Is Mass Student Debt Cancellation Constitutional?

Almost all the 3 ½ hours of colloquy at the February 28, 2023 Supreme Court hearing on the student debt relief cases, Biden v. Nebraska, No. 22-506,  and U.S. Department of Education v. Brown, No. 22-535, was devoted to two issues: (1) whether the plaintiff states and/or individuals have standing to challenge the debt cancellation

Is Mass Student Debt Cancellation Constitutional? Read More »

Scroll to Top