Supreme Court Still Divided Over How To Interpret Express Preemption Provisions

Most of the commentary on the Supreme Court’s June 9, 2014  decision in CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, No. 13-339, has focused on the holding that CERCLA does not preempt state statutes of repose which, after a set number of years, extinguish environmental and toxic tort claims—even if the plaintiff-friendly state statute of limitations that § 9658 of CERCLA mandates has not […]

Supreme Court Still Divided Over How To Interpret Express Preemption Provisions Read More »

Scroll to Top