Who is Suing Who, and Why?

Early in law school, one of my esteemed (but perhaps grammatically challenged) professors explained that the key to understanding any case is figuring out “who is suing who, and why?” On January 15, the Justices very well may have been asking themselves that question during the Supreme Court’s hearing in Home Depot USA, Inc. v. Jackson, No. 17-1471. In […]

Who is Suing Who, and Why? Read More »

Kavanaugh’s Debut Opinion Vindicates Trump’s High Court Pick

Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s first Supreme Court opinion is a model of stylistic clarity and judicial restraint. Writing for a unanimous Court, his January 8,  2019 opinion in Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc., No. 17-1272, holds that where parties have agreed in a contract that an arbitrator—rather than a court—should decide whether

Kavanaugh’s Debut Opinion Vindicates Trump’s High Court Pick Read More »

DOJ Bounty-Hunter Stats Fuel Whistleblower Filings

According to a year-end press release, the U.S. Department of Justice “obtained more than $2.8 billion in settlements and judgments from civil cases involving fraud and false claims against the government in the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2018.” Significantly, $2.1 billion of that $2.8 billion (i.e., about 75%) are attributable to suits filed by whistleblower

DOJ Bounty-Hunter Stats Fuel Whistleblower Filings Read More »

Supreme Court Endangered Frog Opinion Gives Federal Wildlife Agency Reason To Croak

Today’s unanimous Supreme Court opinion in Weyerhauser Co. v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, No. 17-71, empowers federal courts to exercise greater scrutiny over how federal agencies administer the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”). Under the ESA, the Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”)—the Interior Department unit responsible for administering part of the ESA—must designate the “critical habitat”

Supreme Court Endangered Frog Opinion Gives Federal Wildlife Agency Reason To Croak Read More »

Supreme Court Will Review Unfair Class Action Tactic

Class actions are big business for the plaintiffs bar. Lawyers have a better chance of  pocketing enormous, disproportionate, attorney fee awards if they can litigate, or force settlement of, consumer class actions in plaintiff-friendly state courts. Congress enacted the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) in 2005 to help curb state-court class action abuses. One of

Supreme Court Will Review Unfair Class Action Tactic Read More »

The REAL Supreme Court Bar

Late last year the U.S. Supreme Court instituted a new electronic filing system. Among other things, anyone with a computer, tablet, or cell phone now can access newly filed petitions and briefs. Simply search the Court’s online docket for a particular case, click on its docket number, scroll through the hyperlinked docket entries, and read,

The REAL Supreme Court Bar Read More »

Thinking Amicus

Effective use of amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs is an important part of appellate practice in federal and state courts.  Every lawyer who is handling or managing an appeal should “think amicus.”  In other words, think about whether submission of one or more amicus briefs would be helpful to your client’s position. Thinking

Thinking Amicus Read More »

Federal Appeals Court Extinguishes Burn Pit Litigation Against Combat-Zone Contractor

After almost a decade of jurisdictional discovery, pretrial motions, and appeals, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has affirmed dismissal of the “Burn Pit” multidistrict personal injury litigation on the ground that it is barred by the political question doctrine. The litigation encompassed 63 separate complaints, including 44 putative nationwide class actions. 

Federal Appeals Court Extinguishes Burn Pit Litigation Against Combat-Zone Contractor Read More »

Recent Opinion Exemplifies SCOTUS Nominee Kavanaugh’s Lucid Legal Writing

The D.C. Circuit’s recent opinion in Federal Trade Commission v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 16-53556 (June 19, 2018), illustrates Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s exceptionally clear writing style. Occupying only six pages, Judge Kavanaugh’s lucid opinion concisely summarizes and applies existing D.C. Circuit precedent—primarily his prior opinion in In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.,

Recent Opinion Exemplifies SCOTUS Nominee Kavanaugh’s Lucid Legal Writing Read More »

Trade Associations Want to Know: How Much Does an Amicus Brief Cost?

The proliferation of amicus curiae (friend-of-the-court) briefs in federal and state appellate courts—particularly in the U.S. Supreme Court—repeatedly raises the question of how much will an amicus brief cost? For most industry groups and other organizations interested in filing amicus briefs, my answer, as an appellate specialist who practices independently, is “less than you might expect—a

Trade Associations Want to Know: How Much Does an Amicus Brief Cost? Read More »

Scroll to Top