Justice Thomas Challenges Congress To Learn How To Say What It Means

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is known for his staunchly conservative views. He is not whom you might expect to cast a deciding vote that favors class-action plaintiffs. But that is exactly what he did on May 28 in Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Jackson, No. 17-1471. In fact, Justice Thomas authored the Court’s 5-4 […]

Justice Thomas Challenges Congress To Learn How To Say What It Means Read More »

Supreme Court Delivers Another Qui Tam Setback to Government Contractors

On May 13, the Supreme Court issued yet another opinion that facilitates, if not encourages, the filing of False Claims Act qui tam suits against federal government contractors, health care providers, and other recipients of federal payments or funds. In a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Court held in Cochise Consultancy, Inc.,

Supreme Court Delivers Another Qui Tam Setback to Government Contractors Read More »

Law360 Op-Ed on “the Supreme Court Bar” Attracts Wide Readership

Thank you Law 360 subscribers for making my op-ed, A Broader View of the US Supreme Court Bar, that publication’s second-most-read expert analysis during the week of April 22. Law 360 subscribers can access the op-ed here, and anyone can download a copy by clicking above. Earlier in April, I had posted the op-ed on

Law360 Op-Ed on “the Supreme Court Bar” Attracts Wide Readership Read More »

Redefining “the Supreme Court Bar”

Groucho Marx famously said “I don’t want to belong to any club that would accept me as a member.” Unlike Groucho’s club, the Supreme Court Bar is a “club” in which a multitude of talented appellate lawyers throughout the United States—not just an elite handful of marquee players—can be, should be, and in fact are,

Redefining “the Supreme Court Bar” Read More »

Supreme Court Holds that 14-Day Limit for Appealing Class-Certification Orders is Inflexible

The Supreme Court’s February 26, 2019 opinion in Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert, No. 17-1094, unanimously holds that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) is not subject to equitable tolling. In other words, no matter what the circumstances, federal appellate courts cannot consider interlocutory appeals of district court class-action certification decisions if a review petition is filed

Supreme Court Holds that 14-Day Limit for Appealing Class-Certification Orders is Inflexible Read More »

Sweet Victory for Free Speech

San Francisco’s “Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Warning Ordinance” was too much to swallow even for the Ninth Circuit. On January 31 the court issued an en banc ruling requiring that the ordinance be preliminarily enjoined on the ground that its mandatory warning about the alleged health effects of sugary soft drinks chills commercial free speech, and thus,

Sweet Victory for Free Speech Read More »

Kavanaugh’s Debut Opinion Vindicates Trump’s High Court Pick

Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s first Supreme Court opinion is a model of stylistic clarity and judicial restraint. Writing for a unanimous Court, his January 8,  2019 opinion in Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc., No. 17-1272, holds that where parties have agreed in a contract that an arbitrator—rather than a court—should decide whether

Kavanaugh’s Debut Opinion Vindicates Trump’s High Court Pick Read More »

DOJ Bounty-Hunter Stats Fuel Whistleblower Filings

According to a year-end press release, the U.S. Department of Justice “obtained more than $2.8 billion in settlements and judgments from civil cases involving fraud and false claims against the government in the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2018.” Significantly, $2.1 billion of that $2.8 billion (i.e., about 75%) are attributable to suits filed by whistleblower

DOJ Bounty-Hunter Stats Fuel Whistleblower Filings Read More »

Supreme Court Endangered Frog Opinion Gives Federal Wildlife Agency Reason To Croak

Today’s unanimous Supreme Court opinion in Weyerhauser Co. v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, No. 17-71, empowers federal courts to exercise greater scrutiny over how federal agencies administer the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”). Under the ESA, the Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”)—the Interior Department unit responsible for administering part of the ESA—must designate the “critical habitat”

Supreme Court Endangered Frog Opinion Gives Federal Wildlife Agency Reason To Croak Read More »

Scroll to Top