Exactly 50 years ago – all in the same week – I graduated from Harvard Law School, got married, and moved to Washington, D.C. Half a century later, at the age of 75, I’m still practicing law full time in Washington, D.C., and enjoying it more than ever, thanks to my long-time, loyal clients, and […]
Exactly 50 Years Ago . . . Read More »
Law360 has published my sharply critical Expert Analysis of the amicus brief that the U.S. Solicitor General recently submitted to the Supreme Court in Monsanto Co. v. Hardeman, No. 21-241. My analysis explains that – “From the perspective of product liability defense attorneys, the brief from the solicitor general is a transparently partisan, short-sighted effort to
Justices Should Give Feds’ Roundup Amicus Little Weight Read More »
The Supreme Court recently proposed to eliminate the requirement to obtain the parties’ consent, or the Court’s permission, to file an amicus brief. I have written a short insight piece for DRI’s new online publication, The Brief Case, about this important development. My article raises a fundamental point about amicus briefs: Since the purpose of
Welcome News! The Supreme Court Proposes to Ditch the Amicus Brief Consent Requirement Read More »
I was delighted to attend The Federalist Society’s National Lawyers Convention in Washington, DC on November 11-13, 2021 at the Mayflower Hotel. This year’s theme—“Public and Private Power: Preserving Freedom or Preventing Harm?”—covered many current issues expertly addressed from both legal and policy perspectives by prominent federal appellate judges, law professors, and advocacy organizations. The
Thought-Provoking Federalist Society Lawyers Convention Read More »
The following commentary was originally published by Jurist on November 5, 2021. My client, Jamie Belcastro, a registered pharmacist, started Belmora LLC, a small, Virginia-based company that sells nonprescription Flanax pain relief products, about 20 years ago. For much of this time Bayer AG, the multinational pharmaceutical corporation headquartered in Germany—whose gross revenues approach $
Hispanic-Americans May Be the Real Victims of the Flanax Litigation Read More »
Is your case going on appeal? As an appellate specialist, I know that these are the questions many clients want answered: 1. How do appeals differ from trials? 2. What are the key steps in an appeal? 3. Do I really need to hire an appellate specialist? 4. How much will the appeal cost? This
Top 4 FAQs About Appeals Read More »
Multi-faceted regulation of U.S. businesses and industries for the ostensible purpose of preventing, mitigating, or remediating “man-made climate change” is one of the biggest threats confronting free enterprise today. It is a subject which not only requires the application of sound science, but also one that should be left to the political branches of the
NYC Climate Change Suit Melts in Second Circuit Read More »
Why is flat-fee billing better for handling appeals and drafting amicus curiae briefs? Click here to find out why.
Flat-Fee Billing Is Better For Clients & Their Lawyers Read More »
On January 19, 2021 the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in BP v. Baltimore, a case in which the Atlantic Legal Foundation filed an amicus brief arguing that climate-change damages suits belong – if anywhere – in federal, not state, courts. The case involves a procedural issue which has significant implications regarding whether climate-change suits filed
Larry Ebner Quoted About Importance of Supreme Court Climate-Change Case Read More »
I was pleased to assist Dan Fisk, Chairman & President of the Atlantic Legal Foundation, with preparation of a request to the Supreme Court of California for “depublication” of a state Court of Appeal opinion holding, in litigation brought by the American Chemistry Council, that the State’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”) did not abuse its discretion
