ALF Urges California Supreme Court To Review & Reject Expansive Product Liability Theory

In the consolidated Gilead Tenofovir Cases, the California Court of Appeal held that “the legal duty of a manufacturer to exercise reasonable care can, in appropriate circumstances, extend beyond the duty not to market a defective product” (emphasis added). More specifically, the court held that “a drug manufacturer, having invented what it knows is a safer, and at least equally […]

ALF Urges California Supreme Court To Review & Reject Expansive Product Liability Theory Read More »

ALF Urges Supreme Court To Let Scientific Debate Flourish

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear Murthy v. Missouri, No. 23-411, a First Amendment freedom of speech case brought by the States of Missouri and Louisiana and several individual social media users, including public health experts. They seek to enjoin White House, Surgeon General, Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and other

ALF Urges Supreme Court To Let Scientific Debate Flourish Read More »

ALF Urges 4th Circuit To Enforce Electronic Ticket Arbitration Agreements

Electronic tickets, purchased online for admission to sports, entertainment, and many other types of events, have become ubiquitous. When small groups, such as friends or family, plan to attend an event together, it is customary for one individual to purchase tickets for the group, download them to and store them on his or her mobile

ALF Urges 4th Circuit To Enforce Electronic Ticket Arbitration Agreements Read More »

all things amicus

ALF Argues That Arbitration Act’s “Transportation Worker” Exemption Is Narrow

Section 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) mandates that arbitration agreements “shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable.” 9 U.S.C § 2. Section 1 of the FAA, however, exempts “contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.”  9 U.S.C § 1. The Supreme Court

ALF Argues That Arbitration Act’s “Transportation Worker” Exemption Is Narrow Read More »

ALF Urges Supreme Court To Enforce Arbitrator Delegation Clause

The Supreme Court repeatedly has recognized that the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., embodies a strong federal policy requiring judicial enforcement of private-party agreements to resolve disputes through binding arbitration,  which usually is speedier, more efficient, and less expensive than litigation. To facilitate these benefits, arbitration agreements often contain a “delegation clause”

ALF Urges Supreme Court To Enforce Arbitrator Delegation Clause Read More »

ALF Amicus Brief Urges Supreme Court To Decide Where Online Sellers Can Be Sued

Where can a company that offers its products nationwide—either directly through its own interactive website, or indirectly through a third-party online platform such as Amazon—be sued? This is the important, recurring, Internet-age, personal jurisdiction question that the petitioners in Photoplaza, Inc. v. Herbal Brands, Inc., No. 23-504,  are asking the Supreme Court to decide. The certiorari

ALF Amicus Brief Urges Supreme Court To Decide Where Online Sellers Can Be Sued Read More »

ALF & DRI Urge Supreme Court To Limit Civil RICO’s Scope

The Atlantic Legal Foundation and the DRI Center for Law and Public Policy have filed an amicus brief in Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn, No. 23-365, urging the Supreme Court to address the question of whether personal injury claims can be transformed in treble-damages civil RICO suits. Sarah Spencer of Christensen & Jensen and I co-authored

ALF & DRI Urge Supreme Court To Limit Civil RICO’s Scope Read More »

all things amicus

ALF Argues That SEC In-House Enforcement Proceedings Deprive Defendants of Due Process

In SEC v. Jarkesy, No. 22-859, the Supreme Court has agreed to review a Fifth Circuit opinion holding that Securities and Exchange Commission “in-house” civil administrative enforcement proceedings are unconstitutional on three grounds: (i) they deprive respondents (i.e., defendants) of their Seventh Amendment right to a trial by jury; (ii) Congress unconstitutionally delegated legislative power to the

ALF Argues That SEC In-House Enforcement Proceedings Deprive Defendants of Due Process Read More »

ALF Urges Supreme Court To Reject “Conspiracy Jurisdiction”

In BASF Metals Limited v. KPFF Investment, Inc., No. 23-232, two overseas corporate defendants in antitrust litigation involving market prices for platinum and palladium have filed a certiorari petition challenging a Second Circuit decision upholding a New York federal district court’s exercise of “conspiracy jurisdiction.”  On behalf of the Atlantic Legal Foundation (ALF), I have authored and filed an amicus

ALF Urges Supreme Court To Reject “Conspiracy Jurisdiction” Read More »

ALF Amicus Brief Urges Supreme Court To Decide Judicial Transparency Issue

The certiorari petition in Tardy v. Corrections Corporation of America, No. 23-129, requests the Supreme Court to resolve an inter-circuit conflict concerning Article III standing for individuals who seek access to sealed court records. The appeal arises from a Sixth Circuit decision holding that “to have standing, a plaintiff claiming an informational injury must have suffered adverse

ALF Amicus Brief Urges Supreme Court To Decide Judicial Transparency Issue Read More »

Scroll to Top